T’s Point has historically addressed Oxytetracycline Description perceived problems of coal dust near the ERT, it is vital to make sure representation of their perspectives. five. Conclusions The objective of the current study was to investigate PM exposure and temporal AQ trends along an urban waterfront trail, too as the impacts of perceived AQ and perceived health rewards on trail usage. This study aimed to fill analysis gaps related to nearby AQ, as opposed to regional or national AQ research, and outside recreationists’ AQ perceptions, motivations, and preferences. Two conceptual frameworks were applied to discover motivations and preferences: EVT and experiential positive aspects theory. Experiential advantages have previously been identified for additional research [32], but within this study, they did not add substantially to the model predicting trail use. It’s suggested that this framework be re-examined to potentially determine experiential rewards as a complicated component of EVT. Perceived overall health outcomes had been a considerable motivational predictor of trail use, corroborating preceding research [50]. Nonetheless, the PHORS only explained two.1 of theAtmosphere 2021, 12,11 ofvariance in trail use, so exploration of other possible components is merited. Additional research is known as for to assist to bring disparate frameworks like push ull theory, experiential positive aspects, and EVT into a unified motivational framework for recreation researchers. Ultimately, the value of managing the ERT and related resources for trail customers to attain their preferred wellness outcomes cannot be overstated. As the COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated, managing recreational and active transit corridors in urban settings is important to fostering sustainable transitions and neighborhood wellbeing, particularly in the light of growing urbanization plus a altering climate.Author Contributions: Conceptualization, J.E.M. and C.A.B.Z.; methodology, J.E.M. and C.A.B.Z.; software program J.E.M.; validation, J.E.M. and C.A.B.Z.; formal evaluation, J.E.M.; investigation, J.E.M. and C.A.B.Z.; resources, X.Z.; data curation, J.E.M.; writing–original draft preparation, J.E.M.; writing– overview and editing, C.A.B.Z., E.L.H. and X.Z.; visualization, J.E.M.; supervision, C.A.B.Z.; project administration, C.A.B.Z. All authors have read and agreed towards the published version of your manuscript. Funding: This study received no external funding. Institutional Assessment Board Statement: The study was carried out in line with the recommendations on the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Old Dominion University (#1565046-1). Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved within the study. Acknowledgments: Thanks are as a result of following graduate students who assisted with the visitor use survey distribution: Brendan Kane, Christina Viglietta, Eleanor Crofford, Erik Edwards, Pettie Perkins, Patrick Wilson, and Rowan Williams. Moreover, thanks are as a result of Elizabeth River Trail Foundation and former Executive Director, Cheryl White, who supplied access to their listserv and social media accounts following the declaration of the COVID-19 National Emergency. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
atmosphereArticleCompositional Spatio-Temporal PM2.5 Modelling in WildfiresJoseph S chez-Balseca and AgustiP ez-FoguetResearch Group on Engineering Sciences and Worldwide Development (EScGD), Civil and Environmental Engineering Division, Campus N.