I (Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University) for ICP-MS analysis.Determination of La3+ and Ca2+ contents of the media and the purified enzymeThe contents of La3+ and Ca2+ in the media were determined using an Agilent 7500cx ICP-MS system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The buffer containing purified enzyme was re-equilibrated in 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, using a PD-10 column. The enzyme (2.6 mM) was then incubated with 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, at 30uC for 2 h, after which it was desalted and concentrated with an Amicon Ultra-0.5 11967625 mL 3 K concentratorAuthor ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: TN RM AT KK. Performed the experiments: TN RM AT KS ST TI. Analyzed the data: TN RM AT TI TH KK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TN RM AT KK. Wrote the paper: TN RM AT.
The development of a protective vaccine against HIV/AIDS represents the best hope to contain the spread of HIV-1 infection. Given that sexual transmission of HIV-1 is the predominant mode of HIV acquisition in adults [1], a key element for a successful preventive vaccine may be the ability to generate potent immune responses at the mucosal portals of entry (genital tract and rectum). The presence of specific antibodies at the portals of infection provides a first line of adaptive defence for the host against horizontal transmission and the induction of neutralizing or inhibitory anti-Env antibody responses is likely to be the primary component of an effective HIV vaccine [2]. Mucosal vaccination is considered an important strategy to induce local immune responses [3],[4] and different approaches, using DNA, viral vectors and protein based vaccines alone or in combination, are currently under investigation [5]. However given the potential compartmentalization of the mucosal immune system, selection of the most appropriate route of immunisation may be critical for the design of a successful preventive HIV vaccine. Indeed, mucosal responses appear to be more easily elicited by administering vaccines on mucosal surfaces than by parenteral immunisation [6],[7],[8]. Safety is also of Finafloxacin web paramount importance in vaccinedesign and, in this light, proteins are generally considered safe but often lack potency in eliciting immune responses when administered mucosally alone [7]. This likely reflects: the presence of local degrading enzymes; lack of penetration or FK866 site uptake across mucosal barriers and lack of requisite danger signals required to trigger adaptive immunity. For these reasons, adjuvants are thought to be particularly important for mucosal immunisation approaches in order to induce long lasting protective immunity. Different classes of compounds are currently under investigation as vaccine adjuvants [9] and, among these, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands represent very interesting candidates [10]. The TLRs are pathogen recognition receptors (PRR), present on different cell types, which are involved in the recognition of specific microbial molecular motifs. On binding to their respective ligands, TLRs mediate intracellular signalling pathways that lead to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, up-regulation of MHC molecules and amplification of B and T cell responses [11]. In this way, engagement of TLRs link innate and adaptive immune responses and can be exploited for adjuvanticity purposes. Many TLR ligands have proven to be very effective in augmenting both cellular and humoral immune responses in various models [.I (Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University) for ICP-MS analysis.Determination of La3+ and Ca2+ contents of the media and the purified enzymeThe contents of La3+ and Ca2+ in the media were determined using an Agilent 7500cx ICP-MS system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The buffer containing purified enzyme was re-equilibrated in 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, using a PD-10 column. The enzyme (2.6 mM) was then incubated with 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, at 30uC for 2 h, after which it was desalted and concentrated with an Amicon Ultra-0.5 11967625 mL 3 K concentratorAuthor ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: TN RM AT KK. Performed the experiments: TN RM AT KS ST TI. Analyzed the data: TN RM AT TI TH KK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TN RM AT KK. Wrote the paper: TN RM AT.
The development of a protective vaccine against HIV/AIDS represents the best hope to contain the spread of HIV-1 infection. Given that sexual transmission of HIV-1 is the predominant mode of HIV acquisition in adults [1], a key element for a successful preventive vaccine may be the ability to generate potent immune responses at the mucosal portals of entry (genital tract and rectum). The presence of specific antibodies at the portals of infection provides a first line of adaptive defence for the host against horizontal transmission and the induction of neutralizing or inhibitory anti-Env antibody responses is likely to be the primary component of an effective HIV vaccine [2]. Mucosal vaccination is considered an important strategy to induce local immune responses [3],[4] and different approaches, using DNA, viral vectors and protein based vaccines alone or in combination, are currently under investigation [5]. However given the potential compartmentalization of the mucosal immune system, selection of the most appropriate route of immunisation may be critical for the design of a successful preventive HIV vaccine. Indeed, mucosal responses appear to be more easily elicited by administering vaccines on mucosal surfaces than by parenteral immunisation [6],[7],[8]. Safety is also of paramount importance in vaccinedesign and, in this light, proteins are generally considered safe but often lack potency in eliciting immune responses when administered mucosally alone [7]. This likely reflects: the presence of local degrading enzymes; lack of penetration or uptake across mucosal barriers and lack of requisite danger signals required to trigger adaptive immunity. For these reasons, adjuvants are thought to be particularly important for mucosal immunisation approaches in order to induce long lasting protective immunity. Different classes of compounds are currently under investigation as vaccine adjuvants [9] and, among these, Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands represent very interesting candidates [10]. The TLRs are pathogen recognition receptors (PRR), present on different cell types, which are involved in the recognition of specific microbial molecular motifs. On binding to their respective ligands, TLRs mediate intracellular signalling pathways that lead to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, up-regulation of MHC molecules and amplification of B and T cell responses [11]. In this way, engagement of TLRs link innate and adaptive immune responses and can be exploited for adjuvanticity purposes. Many TLR ligands have proven to be very effective in augmenting both cellular and humoral immune responses in various models [.