Among b-lactam antibiotics to reduce resistance over a period of several years [54]. This success is consistent with our results and may have benefitted in its design from the apparent absence of pleiotropic fitness costs associated with expression of most serine b-lactamases [55].Recommendations for Further Development of CyclingIt is likely that effective cycling programs will be specific to local environments and the specific resistance alleles in that environment. The identification of an effective antibiotic cycling program will require identifying the resistance alleles currently circulating in the local environment, determining the fitness of each of those alleles with respect to the set of antibiotics being considered, then identifying those drugs that will result in a repeating cyclic path through the local buy Sudan I adaptive landscape. Additionally, optimizing the order in which antibiotics are applied [11,12] and the duration for which the antibiotics are administered are key [3,10]. The required experiments are neither difficult nor time consuming. The analyses will be facilitated by user-friendly programs that are under development. Although the introduction of unexpected novel alleles, either by mutation or from sources external to the local environment, may disrupt an effective cycling program, identification of those alleles and their addition to the analysis is likely permit effective modification of the cycling program. Applying the suggested antibiotic cycling scheme will be made even more practical as it builds upon thorough analyses of many adaptive landscapes. Moreover, in pathogens such as malaria and HIV where fewer and more predictable resistance mechanisms exist, this method may be more easily implemented.DiscussionOur results indicate that the occurrence of sign epistasis may provide a means for sustainably renewing the usefulness of antibiotics once resistance to them has evolved. Historic failures of ad hoc cycling programs for antibiotics in hospitals have no bearing on our approach. The scheme for drug cycling we suggest relies on current laboratory techniques, as well as established theory of adaptation, and it remains to evaluate our approach in aAntibiotic Cycling and Adaptive LandscapesFigure 2. Example of one possible outcome from antibiotic cycling. These diagrams show that by alternating the antibiotics cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefprozil susceptibility to those antibiotics can be restored in bacterial populations expressing variant alleles present in TEM-50 adaptive landscapes. 2a. (Top left) The TEM-50 adaptive landscape in cefepime. Yellow peaks indicate the adjacent alleles that are important during cefepime selection. 2b. (Top right) The TEM-50 adaptive landscape in ceftazidime. Orange peaks indicate the adjacent alleles that are important during ceftazidime selection. 2c. (Bottom left) The TEM-50 adaptive landscape in cefprozil. Red peaks indicate the adjacent alleles that are important during cefprozil selection. 2d. (Bottom right) SPDB supplier Composite cycle: The yellow arrow indicates the direction of selection in the presence of cefepime. The red arrows indicate the direction of selection in the presence of cefprozil. The orange arrow indicates the direction of selection in the presence of ceftazidime. Rotation of these antibiotics results in cyclical renewal of antibiotic susceptibility. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056040.gMethods Mutants and Susceptibility TestingWe used QuikChangeH site-directed mutagenesis (.Among b-lactam antibiotics to reduce resistance over a period of several years [54]. This success is consistent with our results and may have benefitted in its design from the apparent absence of pleiotropic fitness costs associated with expression of most serine b-lactamases [55].Recommendations for Further Development of CyclingIt is likely that effective cycling programs will be specific to local environments and the specific resistance alleles in that environment. The identification of an effective antibiotic cycling program will require identifying the resistance alleles currently circulating in the local environment, determining the fitness of each of those alleles with respect to the set of antibiotics being considered, then identifying those drugs that will result in a repeating cyclic path through the local adaptive landscape. Additionally, optimizing the order in which antibiotics are applied [11,12] and the duration for which the antibiotics are administered are key [3,10]. The required experiments are neither difficult nor time consuming. The analyses will be facilitated by user-friendly programs that are under development. Although the introduction of unexpected novel alleles, either by mutation or from sources external to the local environment, may disrupt an effective cycling program, identification of those alleles and their addition to the analysis is likely permit effective modification of the cycling program. Applying the suggested antibiotic cycling scheme will be made even more practical as it builds upon thorough analyses of many adaptive landscapes. Moreover, in pathogens such as malaria and HIV where fewer and more predictable resistance mechanisms exist, this method may be more easily implemented.DiscussionOur results indicate that the occurrence of sign epistasis may provide a means for sustainably renewing the usefulness of antibiotics once resistance to them has evolved. Historic failures of ad hoc cycling programs for antibiotics in hospitals have no bearing on our approach. The scheme for drug cycling we suggest relies on current laboratory techniques, as well as established theory of adaptation, and it remains to evaluate our approach in aAntibiotic Cycling and Adaptive LandscapesFigure 2. Example of one possible outcome from antibiotic cycling. These diagrams show that by alternating the antibiotics cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefprozil susceptibility to those antibiotics can be restored in bacterial populations expressing variant alleles present in TEM-50 adaptive landscapes. 2a. (Top left) The TEM-50 adaptive landscape in cefepime. Yellow peaks indicate the adjacent alleles that are important during cefepime selection. 2b. (Top right) The TEM-50 adaptive landscape in ceftazidime. Orange peaks indicate the adjacent alleles that are important during ceftazidime selection. 2c. (Bottom left) The TEM-50 adaptive landscape in cefprozil. Red peaks indicate the adjacent alleles that are important during cefprozil selection. 2d. (Bottom right) Composite cycle: The yellow arrow indicates the direction of selection in the presence of cefepime. The red arrows indicate the direction of selection in the presence of cefprozil. The orange arrow indicates the direction of selection in the presence of ceftazidime. Rotation of these antibiotics results in cyclical renewal of antibiotic susceptibility. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056040.gMethods Mutants and Susceptibility TestingWe used QuikChangeH site-directed mutagenesis (.