Dimers (right; PDB code; 3P57, residues 1?5 [68]) are shown in the same orientation, with the TAZ2 domain shown as a contact surface and the three MEF2 dimers as ribbon representations of their backbone conformations. For clarity the DNA fragments, which bind to opposite face of the MEF2 dimers have been omitted from the figure. The views in panels B and Care MC-LR site rotated about the y axis by 90u and 290u compared to panel A. (TIFF)Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: OO LCW NSD KHK MDC. Performed the experiments: OO LCW SLS NSD VV FWM. Analyzed the data: OO LCW VV FWM PSR KHK MDC. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis tools: FWM PSR KHK. Wrote the paper: OO LCW KHK MDC.
Vaccines administered via mucosal routes are sought-after because they can induce both mucosal and systemic immune responses to protect against infections caused by pathogens entering and colonising mucosal surfaces such as the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Mucosal, humoral responses are characterised by secretory antibodies of which the IgA isotype is the most prominent and IgG less abundant [1,2]. An effective mucosal vaccine must deliver antigen to mucosal inductive sites including the mucosal lymphoid tissue (MALT) or sub-epithelial dendritic cells (DCs) when MALT is absent [1,2]. Activated DCs then transport the antigen via the lymphatics to draining mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) where antigen is presented and a specific immune response mounted. Unfortunately, mucosal immune responses are often variable, particularly when vaccines are delivered orally, exposing the antigen to likely enzymatic degradation in the acidic gastric environment [3]. Vaccine delivery from plant tissues may overcome or at the very least mitigate the hostile gastric environment. Evidence points to antigens bioencapsulated within a plant cell being better protected from the enzymatic degradation of the GIT, prolonging release and presentation of the intact antigen to immune responsive sites of the gut associated lymphoid tissues (GALT) [3]. In addition, plant-made vaccines have a reduced risk of contamination with animal pathogens [4,5] and are stable at room temperature whenstored as seed or freeze-dried material thus reducing the reliance for a cold chain [6,7]. The heat labile toxin (LT) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is a well characterised, mucosal antigen often used as an adjuvant [8,9] or carrier protein [10]. LT comprises a single, active ADPribosylation subunit (LTA) and a non-toxic, pentameric subunit (LTB) [11,12] that selectively binds GM1 ganglioside receptors in the mucosal MedChemExpress 871361-88-5 epithelium of the GIT [13,14]. LTB is stable in the hostile environment of the GIT [15], can be produced in transgenic plants and elicits potent antigen-specific immune responses when delivered orally from various plant tissues [3,10,16,17,18,19,20]. As such, LTB was chosen as a model antigen to study immunogenicity of orally delivered plant-made vaccines in ruminant species. In an earlier study we examined different plant tissues as potential vehicles for oral delivery of recombinant LTB (rLTB) in the mouse GIT [3]. Our findings indicated that the plant tissue type used as the vaccine delivery vehicle affected the timing of antigen release, occurring earlier when delivered from leaf whilst being delayed from root [3]. In this same study, the orally delivered plant-made vaccines produced 10781694 more robust immune responses when formulated in a lipid (oil) based, rather than an aqueous based me.Dimers (right; PDB code; 3P57, residues 1?5 [68]) are shown in the same orientation, with the TAZ2 domain shown as a contact surface and the three MEF2 dimers as ribbon representations of their backbone conformations. For clarity the DNA fragments, which bind to opposite face of the MEF2 dimers have been omitted from the figure. The views in panels B and Care rotated about the y axis by 90u and 290u compared to panel A. (TIFF)Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: OO LCW NSD KHK MDC. Performed the experiments: OO LCW SLS NSD VV FWM. Analyzed the data: OO LCW VV FWM PSR KHK MDC. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis tools: FWM PSR KHK. Wrote the paper: OO LCW KHK MDC.
Vaccines administered via mucosal routes are sought-after because they can induce both mucosal and systemic immune responses to protect against infections caused by pathogens entering and colonising mucosal surfaces such as the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Mucosal, humoral responses are characterised by secretory antibodies of which the IgA isotype is the most prominent and IgG less abundant [1,2]. An effective mucosal vaccine must deliver antigen to mucosal inductive sites including the mucosal lymphoid tissue (MALT) or sub-epithelial dendritic cells (DCs) when MALT is absent [1,2]. Activated DCs then transport the antigen via the lymphatics to draining mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) where antigen is presented and a specific immune response mounted. Unfortunately, mucosal immune responses are often variable, particularly when vaccines are delivered orally, exposing the antigen to likely enzymatic degradation in the acidic gastric environment [3]. Vaccine delivery from plant tissues may overcome or at the very least mitigate the hostile gastric environment. Evidence points to antigens bioencapsulated within a plant cell being better protected from the enzymatic degradation of the GIT, prolonging release and presentation of the intact antigen to immune responsive sites of the gut associated lymphoid tissues (GALT) [3]. In addition, plant-made vaccines have a reduced risk of contamination with animal pathogens [4,5] and are stable at room temperature whenstored as seed or freeze-dried material thus reducing the reliance for a cold chain [6,7]. The heat labile toxin (LT) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is a well characterised, mucosal antigen often used as an adjuvant [8,9] or carrier protein [10]. LT comprises a single, active ADPribosylation subunit (LTA) and a non-toxic, pentameric subunit (LTB) [11,12] that selectively binds GM1 ganglioside receptors in the mucosal epithelium of the GIT [13,14]. LTB is stable in the hostile environment of the GIT [15], can be produced in transgenic plants and elicits potent antigen-specific immune responses when delivered orally from various plant tissues [3,10,16,17,18,19,20]. As such, LTB was chosen as a model antigen to study immunogenicity of orally delivered plant-made vaccines in ruminant species. In an earlier study we examined different plant tissues as potential vehicles for oral delivery of recombinant LTB (rLTB) in the mouse GIT [3]. Our findings indicated that the plant tissue type used as the vaccine delivery vehicle affected the timing of antigen release, occurring earlier when delivered from leaf whilst being delayed from root [3]. In this same study, the orally delivered plant-made vaccines produced 10781694 more robust immune responses when formulated in a lipid (oil) based, rather than an aqueous based me.