Milar distributional properties across messages. We produced the 2000 topics shown in Table S1 as well as on our website. To use topics as features, we find the probability of a subject’s use of each topic: p(topic j subject) Xword[topicPword[vocab (subject)where freq (word,subject) is the number of the times the participant mentions word and vocab (subject) is the set of all words mentioned by the subject. We use ordinary least squares regression to link word categories with author attributes, fitting a linear function between explanatory variables (LIWC categories) and dependent variables (such as a trait of personality, e.g. extraversion). The coefficient of the target explanatory variable (often referred to as b) is taken as the strength of relationship. Including other variables allows us to adjust for covariates such as gender and age to provide the unique effect of a given language feature on each psychosocial variable.Open Vocabulary: Differential Language AnalysisOur technique, differential language analysis (DLA), is based on three key characteristics. It is 1. Open-vocabulary ?it is not limited to (R)-K-13675 cost predefined word lists. Rather, linguistic features including words, phrases, and topics (sets of semantically related words) are automatically determined from the texts. (I.e., it is “data-driven”.) This means DLA is classified as a type of open-vocabulary approach. 2. Discriminating ?it finds key linguistic features that distinguish psychological and demographic attributes, using stringent significance tests. 3. Simple ?it uses simple, fast, and readily accepted statistical techniques. We depict the components of this approach in Figure 1, and describe the three steps: 1) linguistic feature extraction, 2) correlational analysis, and 3) visualization in the following sections. 1. Linguistic Feature Extraction. We Lurbinectedin web examined two types of linguistic features: a) words and phrases, and b) topics. Words and phrases consisted of sequences of 1 to 3 words (often referred to as `n-grams’ of size 1 to 3). What constitutes a word is determined using a tokenizer, which splits sentences into tokens (“words”). We built an emoticon-aware tokenizer on top of Pott’s “happyfuntokenizer” allowing us to capture emoticons like `v3′(a heart) or `:-)’ (a smile), which most tokenizers incorrectly divide up as separate pieces of punctuation. When extracting phrases, we keep only those sequences of words with high informative value according to pointwise mutual information (PMI) [69,70], a ratio of the jointprobability to the independent probability of observing the phrase: pmi (phrase) log p(phrase) P w[phrase p(w)p(topic j word) ?p(word j subject)where p(word j subject) is the normalized word use by that subject and p(topic j word) is the probability of the topic given the word (a value provided from the LDA procedure). The prevalence of a word in a topic is given by p(topic,word), and is used to order the words within a topic when displayed. 2. Correlational Analysis. Similar to word categories, distinguishing open-vocabulary words, phrases, and topics can be identified using ordinary least squares regression. We again take the coefficient of the target explanatory variable as its correlation strength, and we include other variables (e.g. age and gender) as covariates to get the unique effect of the target explanatory variable. Since we explore many features at once, we consider coefficients significant if they are less than a Bonferroni-corrected.Milar distributional properties across messages. We produced the 2000 topics shown in Table S1 as well as on our website. To use topics as features, we find the probability of a subject’s use of each topic: p(topic j subject) Xword[topicPword[vocab (subject)where freq (word,subject) is the number of the times the participant mentions word and vocab (subject) is the set of all words mentioned by the subject. We use ordinary least squares regression to link word categories with author attributes, fitting a linear function between explanatory variables (LIWC categories) and dependent variables (such as a trait of personality, e.g. extraversion). The coefficient of the target explanatory variable (often referred to as b) is taken as the strength of relationship. Including other variables allows us to adjust for covariates such as gender and age to provide the unique effect of a given language feature on each psychosocial variable.Open Vocabulary: Differential Language AnalysisOur technique, differential language analysis (DLA), is based on three key characteristics. It is 1. Open-vocabulary ?it is not limited to predefined word lists. Rather, linguistic features including words, phrases, and topics (sets of semantically related words) are automatically determined from the texts. (I.e., it is “data-driven”.) This means DLA is classified as a type of open-vocabulary approach. 2. Discriminating ?it finds key linguistic features that distinguish psychological and demographic attributes, using stringent significance tests. 3. Simple ?it uses simple, fast, and readily accepted statistical techniques. We depict the components of this approach in Figure 1, and describe the three steps: 1) linguistic feature extraction, 2) correlational analysis, and 3) visualization in the following sections. 1. Linguistic Feature Extraction. We examined two types of linguistic features: a) words and phrases, and b) topics. Words and phrases consisted of sequences of 1 to 3 words (often referred to as `n-grams’ of size 1 to 3). What constitutes a word is determined using a tokenizer, which splits sentences into tokens (“words”). We built an emoticon-aware tokenizer on top of Pott’s “happyfuntokenizer” allowing us to capture emoticons like `v3′(a heart) or `:-)’ (a smile), which most tokenizers incorrectly divide up as separate pieces of punctuation. When extracting phrases, we keep only those sequences of words with high informative value according to pointwise mutual information (PMI) [69,70], a ratio of the jointprobability to the independent probability of observing the phrase: pmi (phrase) log p(phrase) P w[phrase p(w)p(topic j word) ?p(word j subject)where p(word j subject) is the normalized word use by that subject and p(topic j word) is the probability of the topic given the word (a value provided from the LDA procedure). The prevalence of a word in a topic is given by p(topic,word), and is used to order the words within a topic when displayed. 2. Correlational Analysis. Similar to word categories, distinguishing open-vocabulary words, phrases, and topics can be identified using ordinary least squares regression. We again take the coefficient of the target explanatory variable as its correlation strength, and we include other variables (e.g. age and gender) as covariates to get the unique effect of the target explanatory variable. Since we explore many features at once, we consider coefficients significant if they are less than a Bonferroni-corrected.