Calhermeneutical technique for interpreting interview text, simply because the aim of your method was to disclose the which means of nurses’ knowledge of residents’ spiritual needs [44]. The technique of evaluation was inspired by Ricoeur’s philosophy [45]. Interpretations of the text consist of a dialectic movement among understanding the whole text and components of your text, that is constant with the hermeneutic process [46]. This closeness and distance from the text implies interpreting the text with regards to reading the text for what it says and further understanding what the text suggests. The analysis followed three actions: na e reading, structural analysis and formulation of a complete understanding.Na e reading (initial reading)Information were collected from June 2011 to January 2012. A minimum of 1 interview was performed at each and every of the 4 institutions, as well as a follow-up interview was performed. Research shows that recurrent understanding dialogue inside a distinct group may possibly increase the understanding of a theme [40,41]. Through having a follow-up interview, we wanted to obtain the participants’ reflections following the initial interview and deepen many of the topics that the nurses discussed in the very first interview [40]. The exact same moderator (initially author) and observer (second author) conducted all eight interviews that were located inside the nursing houses, lasted 1 ?- 2 hours and recordedThe text was study many times to grasp the meaning as a entire. During the reading, we tried to focus on the nurses’ lived experiences as they reflected around the residents spiritual and existential expressions. Na e reading was discussed between the researchers and further guided the thematic structural evaluation.Structural analysisAll 4 researchers performed information coding. Initially, the text was divided into meaning units. We reflected around the meaning units primarily based on the background of PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20425085 the na e understanding and after that condensed the units to reflect the important meaning. We read via all of the condensed which means units and reflected on their similarities and differences. Sub-themes had been then designed, which have been assembled to themes and most important themes. We further reflected on the themes in relation towards the na e understanding, andbehr et al. BMC Nursing 2014, 13:12 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/13/Page four ofif we found a discrepancy in between the na e understanding and themes, the structural evaluation method was repeated till there was compliance.Complete understandingWe reflected around the themes and sub-themes in relation to our pre-understanding, investigation question, plus the context on the study, in which we sought a complete understanding. The credibility in the findings was assessed within the method of coding, in that we BMS-214662 web selected significant sections from the participants’ statements and identified explicit themes. We sought to safeguard transparency and trustworthiness by way of quotations from various participations in the presentation in the findings. Throughout the whole procedure, we attempted to assess consistency amongst the data presented plus the study findings, which includes each significant and minor themes. By comparing themes for the naive reading, we strengthened the validity on the analysis.Ethical considerationsreligious activities, for example prayer and singing hymns. Additionally, they observed that residents wanted to connect to them on a individual level. The nurses described residents’ prior interests, like nature experiences, culture and traditions as spiritual requires, as.