E welded -AG 99 Technical Information samples were carried out on an Instron 5982 universal cross-sections of welded samples were reduce parallel for the direction of vibrations of the testing machine welding instrument. The surfaces from the sections have been mechanically and at con-polished. (Instron Corp., Grove City, PA, USA) at space temperature ground and stant crosshead The finishing mm/min. was carried out on a clamped inwith wedge grips of 0.05 . speed of 0.five treatment The samples have been suspension the a particle size of your machine. The lap shear strength, m, was obtained by dividing the maximum applied Fractographic and structural analyses had been performed by scanning electron microscopy on a the region of welding spot, scanning electron microscope (TESCAN ORSAY HOLDING force of tension byTESCAN MIRA 3 LMH FEGi.e., 27 mm2. No less than 3 samples have been tested a.s., Brno-Kohoutovice, Czech Republic) equipped using a benefits had been averfor the identical structure, sample variety, and welding conditions, and theCHANNEL five EBSD (electron back-scatter diffraction) the measurement error. aged. Normal deviation was taken asanalyzer (Oxford Instruments HKL, Oxford, UK). According to the structural all samples have been investigated in their cross-sections. The The microstructures of state, the EBSD evaluation was performed using a scanning step from 0.1 to 1 ; two to three maps have been obtained from every sample. CHANNEL 5 application (Oxford cross-sections of welded samples have been cut parallel for the path of vibrations of the Instruments HKL, Oxford, UK) was utilized for processing the outcomes of EBSD scanning. welding instrument.evaluation was carried out in accordance with all the recommendations of [26,27]. When The The surfaces of your sections had been mechanically ground and polished. The finishing therapy was carried maps, misOligomycin In stock orientations withthan two had been not taken m. account; processing the EBSD out on a suspension significantly less a particle size of 0.05 into Fractographic and structural analyses had been performed 15 scanning electron low-angle boundaries boundaries with misorientations from two to by were thought of as microscopy (LABs), and boundaries with electron microscope (TESCAN ORSAY HOLDon a TESCAN MIRA three LMH FEG scanning misorientations additional than 15 were considered as high-angle boundaries (HABs). Republic) equipped having a CHANNEL five EBSD (elecING a.s., Brno-Kohoutovice, CzechThe high- and low-angle boundaries had been plotted as black and white lines, respectively, within the (Oxford Instruments HKL, Oxford, UK). Dependtron back-scatter diffraction) analyzer crystal orientation maps (COMs). Twin boundaries had been identified depending on the Brandon evaluation was performed with scanning step from ing around the structural state, the EBSDcriterion and had been not highlightedain the COMs. Individual colors within the COMs corresponded to specific crystal orientations; the color-code triangles have been 0.1 to 1 m; two to three maps had been obtained from every single sample. CHANNEL 5 computer software shown within the upper proper corners of your maps. The equivalent diameter was accepted as the (Oxford Instruments HKL,The quantitative analysis forthe microstructure was performedscangrain size. Oxford, UK) was used of processing the results of EBSD in accordance ning. The evaluation was carried out in accordance with theconfidence amount of 90 . [26,27]. together with the specifications of ASTM E112-10 using a suggestions of When processing the EBSD maps, misorientations less than 2were not taken into ac3. with and Discussion count; boundariesResultsmisorientations from 2 to 15were c.