Resuscitation, somatic, infectious diseases, endocrinology, and urology.In just about every hospital, group discussions and person interviews took place.All kids had been interviewed individually.Some parentscaregivers were interviewed, whilst other individuals participated in group discussions.When the data collection method was completed, the data have been forwarded towards the Youngster and Adolescent Overall health Plan at WHOEurope for analysis and preparation of a final report.Patient interviews in all three countries were confidential and prior consent to participation was obtained, in oral type.Second assessmentFollowing the first assessment, the hospital managers in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan initiated numerous modifications to address identified gaps in kid rights.In Tajikistan, the improvement method was also supported by the project steering group, composed of national authorities and MoH Cancer representatives, whose function was to oversee, help, and monitor implementation with the WHO project on enhancing pediatric hospital care.In Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, the tools for assessment and improvement PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21584789 of children’s rights in hospital have been utilized to assess improvement resultsRelated to WHO project Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes YesTimeframe of assessment of kid rights JulyTimeframe of QoC assessment JulyKyrgyzstanCentral Regional DistrictMoldovaCentral Municipal DistrictOctoberSeptemberOctober ( central, municipal, district hospitals) AugustTajikistanRegional DistrictMayJUNEVOLUMENUMBERHealth and Human Rights JournalA.I.F.Guerreiro, A.Kuttumuratova, K.Monolbaev, L.Boderscova, Z.Pirova, and M.W.Weber papers, about a single year just after the first assessment.All hospitals that had participated in the 1st round of assessment also participated inside the second round.All participating hospitals in both nations carried out group discussions and person interviews to assess the respect of children’s rights.In Moldova, the MoH used the findings and suggestions from the 1st round of assessment to create a national strategy of actions to enhance QoC in pediatric hospitals but did not proceed with a second round of assessment of children’s rights in hospital.Normal Quality services for childrenIn the three participating nations, selfevaluation teams in all hospitals stated that care was delivered primarily based on national and international suggestions.In Moldova, the recommendations were developed nationally through ad hoc committees created up of university employees and wellness pros, in partnership with all the MoH.Subsequently, all hospitals adapted the national protocols to their very own context.In Moldova, the principle connected gap identified by the selfevaluation teams was that a number of the national suggestions were not in line with the international ones and hence need to be adjusted, based on evidencebased medicine.No gaps have been identified in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.The question posed to parentscaregivers and to year old youngsters and adolescents by the selfevaluation team was, “Do you feel youyour youngster received the most effective doable care” All parents caregivers and youngsters and adolescents inside the 3 countries stated that they have been happy with the care received.With regards to training, there had been some variations involving the participating nations.In Moldova, all medical physicians and nurses operating in pediatric care had a specialization in pediatrics; in Kyrgyzstan, in eight hospitals, doctors and nurses working with young children have been trained in pediatric care; and in Tajikistan, in seven hospitals, do.