Omeone touching their individual belongings led to knowledge of touch on their own physique (e.g “a prickling sensation on the back of my neck PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21540755 that is definitely both painful and pleasurable”).Note that these participants provided this information in a comment box despite the fact that they were not directly asked about these perceptions, so the occurrence is undoubtedly greater than what we discovered.In contrast to perceptions in response to lamps (Banissy et al), each and every of our 3 participants reported this practical experience specifically for their personal possessions.This suggests that emotion may possibly play a function inside the encounter of tactile phenomena which include mirrortouch and synesthesia.Although some participants’ tactile experiences Celgosivir site generalized to strangers and fictional characters, quite a few reported that their mirrortouch responses had been enhanced foror even limited topeople with whom they really feel close.Such reports are consistent with preceding findings, like those showing that mirrortouch perceptions are stronger for observed touch of genuine bodies than of dummy bodies (n ; Holle et al).Ticker tape experiences also showed a wealth of individual differences, as reported in semistructured interviews of participants recruited from our sample for another study (Chun and Hup [Abstract]; ticker tape guys, women).Most participants reported a continual size and font for visualized letters; nevertheless, some men and women reported experiencing a alter in letter size depending on the volume with which words are spoken.Frontiers in Psychology Cognitive ScienceNovember Volume Post Chun and HupMirrortouch, ticker tape, and synesthesiaThe way in which ticker tape perceptions were “displayed” varied too we received reports of both static show, on a screen inside the head or in front on the body, and dynamic display, with words that stream out by means of the mouth or from behind the head.1 ticker taper reported that throughout a verbal fluency activity, tips “stacked up” visually behind her head prior to streaming via her mouth as she said them aloud.When also several concepts were becoming held there, some would disappear ahead of she could say them and therefore disappeared from memory.A subset of ticker tapers described visualizing noises spelled out onomatopoetically (“as in a comic book”), whereas others didn’t.Likewise, some ticker tapers reported spelling out words phonetically from an unknown language although for other people, ticker tape seemed directly linked to comprehension they reported that hearing a language they don’t recognize would fail to elicit ticker tape.PREVALENCE COMPARISONSthe use of distinctive populations, distinct recruitment and sampling tactics, and distinctive diagnostic criteria amongst studies, their comparability is arguably limited.Nonetheless, prevalence estimates inside the existing study are not considerably various from these previously reported in the literature for graphemecolor and sequencespace associations, also as for initial selfreport of mirrortouch.Our estimates are slightly larger than previous reports for personcolor and temporal sequencecolor and are much larger than prior prevalence estimates for OLP; hypotheses to clarify such discrepancies are proposed beneath.Although the estimated prevalence of auditioncolor inside the present study appears elevated in comparison to a previous report, this difference might be because of the queries we asked (see Appendix, Interior Experiences Survey) we asked participants no matter if they connected colors with sounds and voices, also to music (Simn.