E expression trend between lncRNA XLOC_001056 (blue line) and its 303 negatively
E expression trend between lncRNA XLOC_001056 (blue line) and its 303 negatively correlated PC genes (black lines). Z-score used in (a) and (c) was obtained from averaged FPKM from two replicatesfruit initiation. In contrast, the C1 cluster of lncRNAs may possess opposite roles and may be involved in repressing receptacle fruit development.The five lncRNAs with the highest number of negatively co-regulated genes are shown in a graph (Fig. 5b). Each of the five lncRNAs is connected to the co-Kang and Liu BMC Genomics (2015) 16:Page 9 ofregulated genes in the genome with colored lines. These 5 lncRNAs are all expressed at a low level in the receptacle fruit, with four belonging to the C1 cluster (Fig. 5a, Additional file 1: Figure S5A). In contrast, their negatively correlated 553 PC genes are more highly expressed in the receptacle (Additional file 13). Fig. 5c illustrates the expression of lncRNA XLOC_001056 and its corresponding 303 negatively co-regulated PC genes. Given that these 5 lncRNAs could potentially contribute to the regulation of such a large number of negatively correlated PC genes, their impact on the development of fruit could be significant. Enriched GO terms for these 553 PC genes include metabolic processes and intracellular transport processes, consistent with functions in fruit tissue development (Additional file 1: Figure S5B, Additional file 13). These analyses not only identified fve-lncRNAs with potential regulatory roles in trans, but also highlighted specific lncRNAs that could potentially serve as hubs in a coordinated gene expression networks underlying receptacle fruit development.Examination of evolutionary P144 Peptide price conservation of lncRNAsIf lncRNAs perform evolutionarily conserved functions, they could be conserved across species even though a lack of coding constraints may enable rapid changes in DNA sequences. Thus, we investigated if any of the fvelncRNAs identified in this study are conserved across different plant species. First, we used the fve-lncRNAs to blast against the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, maize (Zea mays), rice (Oryza sativa), apple (Malus domestica), and peach (Prunus persica); 36, 50, 52, 450 and 511 PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768400 Fve-lncRNAs were found to share similarities with certain sequences in the respective plant genomes (Evalue < 0.001). Since apple, peach, and strawberry belong to the Rosaceae family, they are more closely related to one another. The numbers above suggest that about 1Table 2 Identification of conserved lncRNAs in related speciesNumber of Fve-lncRNAs with homologs in other species 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 0/0 -/49/37 19/7 Number of Arabidopsis lncRNAs with homologs in other species -/0/0 0/0 5/27 5/9 0/0 2/2 0/of the fve-lncRNAs have potential conserved counterparts in the non-Roseceae species and about 10 fvelncRNAs have potential homologs in the Roseceae species. Hence, the evolutionary conservation of lncRNA is rather limited. The above analysis could not determine if the homologous sequence in the other species encode lncRNAs. Therefore, we investigated if the fve-lncRNAs are homologous to lncRNAs already identified in these species. Currently, 6,480 lncRNAs were identified in Arabidopsis [31], 2,224 lncNRAs were identified in rice [35], and several thousand lncRNAs were reported from two studies in Zea mays. Boerner and McGinnis first identified 2,492 maize lncRNAs [30]; Li reported 1704 high confidence lncRNAs and 18,459 pre-lncRNAs in maize [47]. 5,884 fve-lncRNAs were blasted against the lncRN.